Видео

My suggestion would be to rely less on presets in general, since a lot of these will work with very specific lighting conditions. That still won't solve Apple's ProRAW format issues but in the end you will be able to get better results out of that format. I would say try using regular RAW since it will be more flexible than the compressed and highly processed JPG coming straight out of the camera.

I got lazy near the end... 😆

Cheers. Glad you like the idea. Yeah at some point I will try to re-use the prompts and see if I can get better results. From what I'm reading though, in order to reach this next level of quality - at least for chatGPT - the A.I. has to consume an ungodly amount of data, which doesn't even exist yet. Really crazy stuff...

My guess is you haven’t actually watched the video. I’m touching on these issues right after the end of the short.

@@marvelousdecay I watched up until the ai video started, that's why i was saying, I don't see the value. I am interested in your perspective on it for sure, so I'll have a look at your finishing comments now. Perhaps it might be helpful to put a timer on the next one? that way people can skip forward to hear your thoughts on it without having to watch the ai. I realise though that would result in missing context? I don't know what else to suggest. :/

oh, wow that's not just closing comments. You said a lot about it, quite the analysis. I don't have much more to add though ^^

Make sure to use the search option in the app store. If you still can't find them use the app's official websites and the links there will send you to the app.

uMake is not a sketching app. It's a modelling/CAD app just like Shapr3D.

@@marvelousdecay yeah it evolved thats true - but it is different quite different to what Shapr3D is. That’s an apple vs banana comparison

@@studioryley Glad you liked it! I do have a newer video talking about the performance of the M3 and the future M4! Have a look at this video here: ruclips.net/video/RcHI53HV3hg/видео.htmlsi=_4aC4yP6bYN65QKu The M3 is looking good but the M4 will probably be the SoC that starts getting closer to NVidia performance.

Yeah all m4/3 cameras and above (APSC, medium format etc) will give so much better results. Even if they're ancient! I'm glad we have the ability to take pictures with our phones but we still have a lot of room until we reach a real's camera's quality.

The method you're describing can be achieved with regular photogrammetry which are supported in the Object capture API. Apple's new addition use the accelerometer among other things so you have to move around the object.

I'm not familiar with that camera so I'm afraid I can't answer your question. My guess is that the lumix fz200 has the bigger sensor but better do some research to be on the safe side.

I’m trying to buy lumix Fz40. But idk if it gonna be good

@@Fastfast0103 Try to get a more recent cheap dslr and you'll be good to go. There are plenty from canon and other brands that can easily outperform any phone out there.

@@marvelousdecay is dslr better than digital cameras? My purpose of use is for Real Estate. Just pics of houses. Apartments. Rooms. Etc. I’ll prefer less setup and quick sharing to Mac. I was using iPhone 13 in 0.7 but it lose quality. And 0.5 is too open.

Btw Thanks for answering 👍🏼

You are welcome!

You’re welcome!

Glad you liked it!

Hey there! I would say that even though things have changed in both apps when it comes to UI and functionality, the result is not much different. Shapr3D is still the better choice!

@@marvelousdecayOk, thank you!

That was from the "Tree of life". The light is right behind the glass which what gives it this very vibrant look. But if you're looking for the exact type of pigment I'm not sure.

Try to eliminate all variables in your testing, since photogrammetry results depend a lot on angles and lighting. So give the following a try: Test both apps with the exact same images and compare the results. Either way though if you prefer Kiri use that. No need to fix what ain't broken!

Hey there. Great to see the team actively looking for community feedback, and great to see that you're aware of some of these issues! • As stated on the video texture resolution is quite a hindrance currently. If and when you manage to fix that, that will make recommending the app a lot easier! Great to hear that it's in the plans for future updates! • Another issue that is definitely minor compared to texture resolution has to do with object scale. The USDZ files always export with really small scale. Most objects export as 1 to 2cm in size, which means that there's a lot of resizing involved. It's not a huge deal but I would prefer a x10 multiplier rather than these small 1cm objects. There's also a couple more issues with the UI so I'll definitely try to reach out to you over email. If you don't hear from me in the coming days feel free to contact me through my email. You can find it the about section of my channel.

I definitely appreciate the efforts of the development team. It looks like the team is constantly adding features to the app which is great to see! About the featureless scanning: It's a good idea but I don't find it that useful. I guess it depends on what you want to do with the final mesh. Personally if I want to scan a featureless object I just sprinkle regular baby powder on the object and follow the typical photogrammetry procedures. The benefit with that is that you can get a very detailed mesh that you can then clean up and edit accordingly. The same goes for the quad mesh straight out of the app. As good as that might sound, I'm not entirely sure what the use case for it might be. I understand that it's convenient but if I'm going to use the object on a project I will adjust things myself either way, so having quads from the beginning is not so important. At least for me! As I mentioned earlier it all depends on your use case. If it fits your workflow and projects go for it!

Do you mean how to export them from the apps? Both applications have an export command where you pick the format you want. I picked USDZ but you also pick fbx or obj etc.

Yes! Thank you, and which program do you use in the end, is it 3d max or zbrush? I can’t recognize

The program you see in the video is Cinema 4D but when I’m preparing the final asset it’s usually a combination of Zbrush for cleaning up the scan, Substance Painter for cleaning up the texture and refining things and then Cinema 4D and Redshift for scene creation and rendering.

Good point. Looks like this is what’s happening. You can use the volume buttons to take a picture. Unfortunately though the audio stops the moment you enter the app. It would be nice if there was a setting to enable/disable that option.

@@marvelousdecay agree. they could easily switch this on/off via a button in the settings.

Yeah that's true. It's one of the reasons I didn't go with the first versions of the Mseries chips (M1, M2, M3) since things are still advancing pretty fast. Hopefully the new Mac Pro will have upgradeable graphics... Here's hoping..

Haha nice one! About the width: I can’t think of something right now but I’m sure there’s a hack or some other way to do it.

@@marvelousdecay yeah I'm new to the software so I thought I'd ask but there doesn't seem to be a "just plug the null's scale to <__>" solution 🤔 surprisingly few online resources for this really cool piece of software, even searching the web yields lots of results about the military unit haha...

@@4.0.4 yeah it's a small software company and the software hasn't fully caught on yet, but it's incredibly powerful. Reach out to the creators on twitter. They are very friendly and incredibly helpful. They might be able to point you to the right direction.

The Mac Studio has its positives for sure. It’s an amazing editing machine and a great all rounder but when it comes to 3d rendering it’s severely lacking. I can’t blame the reviewers though. They can only test the things they’re most familiar with.

Glad you enjoy the content! If you're on a PC Reality Capture is the way to go, and if you're on a Mac either Metashape or the desktop version of Photocatch

@@marvelousdecay Thank you so so much

Yeah when it’s a free product you could somehow excuse the poor design choices. But when it’s a paid product the excuses start to dwindle!

Thanks! For Photogrammetry I'm using the desktop version of Photocatch and also Metashape. Both do the same thing but since Photocatch uses Apple's SDK the results are very fast.

:D

Yeah there are several ways to approach this in Cinema too. I chose the scatter brush because I like the way I can control the placement. All the manual rotations and placements after the brush application was just me being over the top for no reason! Hahaha I would no suggest anyone doing what I did at all!

@@marvelousdecay it did look awesome though (aside from the onions 😂 it made me think how I'd do the onions and I quickly realized they're actually really hard!)

Have fun!

Haven't tried that but I wouldn't be surprised if there was some sort of bug. Definitely post the issue on Redshift's forum for the developers to see and hopefully fix.

Thank you. I do have an Artstation account but haven’t updated it for a while. Better check my personal website (marvelousdecay.com)

Thanks Raphael! Haha yeah the bottle and underwater scenes were some of my favorites back then! I can't remember at all how it was done but I wonder if it was PLA animation? No clue! 😆 It's so wild to think how much we've progressed since then on the technology front! Now our phones are multiple times faster than any desktop computer of that time. Crazy!

When it comes to 3D rendering the M3 (Max) is significantly faster than M1 and M2. The M3 Max for example is faster than the M2 Ultra. So if you're looking to get a new machine, aim for the m3 max. If you can wait a couple more months the M4 is just around the corner. I will personally wait for the M4. From what we can tell it's going to be a nice jump in performance so if you can afford to wait you'll be better off.

@@marvelousdecay what do you think would be best: An M1 max, 32gpu, 96GB, 4TB Or M2 max, 38gpu, 64GB, 2TB Or M3 max, 40gpu, 48GB, 1TB

In terms of raw speed the M3 Max is the better option of the two. My only issue with the setup you posted is the very little SSD space and the relatively low RAM. If you can bump the M3 Max to 64GB and 2TB you'll have a nice beefy setup. But if you gotta cut something go for the 64GB Ram and keep the 1TB SSD. Just keep in mind though that you'll have to carry around an external drive to help with storage. But it's a good enough compromise.

@marvelousdecay I appreciate your response again. I might be able to upgrade after 6 months, but I need something to work with now and sell this once. So the above 3 listed were my only options.